The European Court of Human Rights and The 1995 UNIDROIT Convention in the Victorious Youth Decision

The European Court of Human Rights case “J. Paul Getty Trust and Others v. Italy” (35271/19, 2 May 2024) revolves around the confiscation of the “Victorious Youth” statue (also referred to as the “Athlete of Fano” or the “Lysippus of Fano”) by Italy, which the Getty Museum claimed violated their property rights. The Court ruled in favour of Italy’s right to demand the return of the Greek bronze statue, attributed to Lysippus, that is currently in the Getty Villa Museum in Malibu, California. It unanimously ruled to reject an appeal filed by the J. Paul Getty Trust against the confiscation order issued by the Italian authorities, saying there had been no violation of the right to protection of property.

Crucially, the Court’s decision was influenced by the 1995 UNIDROIT Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects, even though the U.S. is not a party to it. The Convention’s principles on the restitution and return of stolen or illegally exported cultural property were used as a normative framework, reinforcing international standards. This case underscores the Convention’s growing impact on international law, shaping norms and due diligence standards in cultural property acquisitions, and illustrating its role in evolving customary international law.

See the note published by Ryan Walsh on the 1995 UNIDROIT Convention Academic Project’s website (UCAP website).

For more information on the ECHR case

For more information on the 1995 UNIDROIT Convention

Comments are closed.