Study III – International law on arbitration (1929 – 1956)
Study XXV – Arbitration between governments and individuals (1948 – 1951)
U.P.L. 1956 – Et/III – Doc. 36
Memorandum from the International Institute for the Unification of Private Law to the attention of the Economic and Social Council of the United Nations, re: the Report of the Committee on the Enforcement of International Arbitral Awards
U.D.P. 1955 – Et/III – Doc. 35 [in French only] Aperçu synthétique sur l’arbitrage basé sur le Rapport de M. René David et sur les principales législations européennes
U.D.P 1955 – Et/III – Doc. 34 [in French only]L’arbitrage dans les rapports internationaux en droit privé. Memorandum à l’usage du Conseil de l’Europe
U.D.P 1954 – Projet III (3)
Projet d’une loi uniforme sur l’arbitrage dans les rapports internationaux en droit privé et Rapport explicatif / Draft of a Uniform Law on Arbitration in respect of International Relations of Private Law and Explanatory Report
U.D.P 1954 – Etude III – Arbitrage – Doc. 33 [in French only]Modifications au Rapport illustratif concernant la loi uniforme sur l’arbitrage (Projet III(2)) apportées par la Sous-Commission du Conseil lors de sa réunion tenue à Rome le 17 avril 1954
U.D.P 1954 – Etude III – Arbitrage – Doc. 32 [in French only] Observations de S.Exc. le Prof. Jules Basdevant sur l’Avant-Projet d’une loi uniforme sur l’arbitrage dans les rapports internationaux en droit privé (Projet III (2))
U.D.P 1953 – Projet III (2) [in French only]Avant-projet d’une loi uniforme sur l’arbitrage dans les rapports internationaux en droit privé et Rapport explicatif
U.D.P 1952 – Etude III – Arbitrage – Doc. 31 [in French only] Comité d’étude pour l’arbitrage en droit privé. Rapports entre le Projet de loi uniforme sur l’arbitrage et la Convention de Genève de 1927
U.D.P 1948 – Proyecto III
Anteproyecto de una ley uniforme sobre el arbitraje en las relaciones internacionales de derecho privado
U.D.P 1946 – Etude III – Arbitrage – Doc. 30 [in French only] Comité d’étude pour l’arbitrage en droit privé. Modification proposée par M. René David au projet de loi sur l’arbitrage et au rapport accompagnant ce projet
U.P.L 1940 – Draft III (1) (5.166 KB)
Preliminary draft of a uniform law on arbitration in respect of international relations of private law [with explanatory notes] – Rome, 1940
S.d.N. – U.D.P 1938 – Etude III – Arbitrage – Doc. 29(1) [in French only] Comité d’étude pour l’arbitrage en droit privé. Rapport. Avant-projet d’une loi uniforme sur l’arbitrage en droit privé
S.d.N. – U.D.P 1938 – Etude III – Arbitrage – Doc. 23(1) [in French only]Avant-projet d’une loi uniforme sur l’arbitrage en droit privé
S.d.N. – U.D.P 1938 – Etude III – Arbitrage – Doc. 28 [in French only] Comité d’étude pour l’arbitrage en droit privé. Procès-verbaux, sixième session, Stockholm, 30 septembre – 1er octobre 1937
S.d.N. – U.D.P 1937 – Etude III – Arbitrage – Doc. 27 [in French only] Observations de M. Symon Rundstein sur les amendements proposés par la Chambre de Commerce Internationale
S.d.N. – U.D.P 1937 – Etude III – Arbitrage – Doc. 26 [in French only]Amendements proposés par la Chambre de Commerce Internationale sur l’Avant-projet d’une loi internationale sur l’arbitrage en droit privé (Doc. 23)
S.d.N. – U.D.P 1936 – Etude III – Arbitrage – Doc. 23
Projet d’une loi internationale sur l’arbitrage en droit privé / Draft of an International Law on Arbitration
S.d.N. – U.D.P 1936 – Etude III – Arbitrage – Doc. 22 [in French only]
Observations de MM Szymond Rundstein, Emil Sandström et B.A. Wortley sur 1. la nouvelle rédaction de l’Avant-projet d’une loi internationale sur l’arbitrage en droit privé (Doc. 20); 2. – le texte provisoire du Projet du Rapport sur l’Avant-projet (Doc. 21)
S.d.N. – U.D.P 1936 – Etude III – Arbitrage – Doc. 24
Comité d’étude pour l’arbitrage en droit privé. Rapport sur le Projet d’une loi uniforme sur l’arbitrage / Committee on Arbitration. The Report on a Draft Uniform Law on Arbitration
S.d.N. – U.D.P 1936 – Etude III – Arbitrage – Doc. 25 [in French only]Comité d’étude pour l’arbitrage en droit privé. Procès-verbaux, cinquième session, Trouville, 30 juillet – 2 août 1936
S.d.N. – U.D.P 1936 – Etude III – Arbitrage – Doc. 21 [in French only] Comité d’étude pour l’arbitrage en droit privé. Texte provisoire du Projet de Rapport sur l’Avant-projet d’une loi uniforme sur l’arbitrage (Nouvelle Rédaction)
S.d.N. – U.D.P 1935 – Etude III – Arbitrage – Doc. 20 (977 KB)
Avant-projet d’une loi internationale sur l’arbitrage en droit privé (Nouvelle rédaction) / Preliminary Draft of an International Law on Arbitration (New Redaction) – Rome, juin 1936
S.d.N. – U.D.P 1936 – Etude III – Arbitrage – Doc. 19 [in French only] Comité d’étude pour l’arbitrage en droit privé. Résumé des procès-verbaux, quatrième session, San Remo, 16-20 avril 1936
S.d.N. – U.D.P 1936 – Etude III – Arbitrage – Doc. 18 [in French only] Comité d’étude pour l’arbitrage en droit privé. Tableau synoptique. Observations sur l’Avant-projet d’une loi internationale sur l’Arbitration en droit privé (Doc. 13) de
1. – Suède: L’Association Générale des Exportateurs Suédois, la Fédération des Industries Suédoises, l’Institut d’Arbitrage de l’Industrie technique suédoise, la Chambre de Commerce de Stockholm;
2. – Pologne: a) M. Sulkowski, Professeur de droit commercial à l’Université de Pornay et M. Srymanski, Conseiller au Département législatif du Ministère de Justice; b) M. Babinski, jurisconsulte au Ministère des Affaires Etrangères, Agent du Gouvernement au Tribunal arbitral polonais-allemand à Beuthen; c) M. Kuratow-Kuratowski, ancien professeur de droit civil, Membre du Comité d’études d’Arbitrage de la Chambre de Commerce Internationale;
3. – M. David.
U.D.P 1936 – Etude III – Arbitrage – Doc. 17 [in French only]Comité d’étude pour l’arbitrage. Chambre de commerce internationale : Discussion du Comité d’Etudes de l’Arbitrage commercial international sur l’avant-projet d’une loi internationale sur l’arbitrage en droit privé (Doc. 13) : I. – Extrait du procès-verbal de la 12ème session, 19 décembre 1935; II. – Procès-verbal de la 13ème session, 9 et 10 janvier 1936
S.d.N. – U.D.P 1936 – Etude III – Arbitrage – Doc. 16 [in French only] Comité d’étude pour l’arbitrage en droit privé. Projet de Rapport sur l’Avant-projet d’une loi uniforme sur l’arbitrage
S.d.N. – U.D.P 1935 – Etude III – Arbitrage – Doc. 15 [in French only] Comité d’étude pour l’arbitrage en droit privé. Procès-verbaux. Troisième session, Cortina d’Ampezzo, 3-7 juillet 1935
S.d.N. – U.D.P 1935 – Etude III – Arbitrage – Doc. 14 [in French only]Comitè pour l’arbitrage. Exposé sommaire des motifs concernant l’avant-projet d’une loi internationale sur l’arbitrage en droit privé (U.D.P 1935 – Etudes III Doc. 13)
S.d.N. – U.D.P 1935 – Etude III – Arbitrage – Doc. 13
Avant-projet d’une loi internationale sur l’arbitrage en droit privé, présenté par le Comité pour l’arbitrage de l’Institut / Preliminary Draft of an International Law on Arbitration, presented by the Institute’s Committee on Arbitration
Observations suédoises sur l’Avant-projet d’une loi uniforme sur l’arbitrage en droit privé [in French only]
Aperçu sur les travaux en cours à l’Institut international pour l’unfiication du droit privé en matière d’arbitrage, Paris, 25 juin 1935 [in French only]
U.D.P 1935 – Etude III – Arbitrage – Doc. 12 [in French only] Comité pour l’Arbitrage. Table synoptique. Premières lignes d’un Avant-Projet de loi uniforme (Doc. 9(1)) et observations et modifications proposées par MM David, Rundstein et Wortley
S.d.N. – U.D.P 1935 – Etude III – Arbitrage – Doc. 11 bis [in French only]Comité pour l’Arbitrage. Observations de MM David et Sandström sur le Compte-rendu des travaux du Comité pour l’Arbitrage. Deuxième session: Rome, 13-18 janvier 1935
U.D.P 1935 – Etude III – Arbitrage – Doc. 11 [in French only]
Comité pour l’Arbitrage. Observations et modifications proposées par MM David, Rundstein et Wortley aux Premières lignes d’un Avant-Projet de loi uniforme (Doc. 9(1))
S.d.N. – U.D.P 1935 – Etude III – Arbitrage – Doc. 10 [in French only] Comité pour l’Arbitrage. Deuxième session : Rome, 13-18 janvier 1935. Compte-rendu des travaux du Comité
U.D.P 1935 – Etude III – Arbitrage – Doc. 9(1) [in French and in English]
Comité de l’Arbitrage. Deuxième session : Rome, 13-18 janvier 1935. Premières lignes d’un Avant-projet de loi uniforme adoptées par le Comité le 18 janvier 1935
U.D.P 1934 – Etude III – Arbitrage – Doc. 8 [in French only] Avant-projet d’une loi internationale sur l’arbitrage. Cet Avant-projet à été élaboré selon les lignes établies à la première session du Comité pour l’Arbitrage, Brioni, 13-18 août 1934
S.d.N. – U.D.P 1934 – Etude III – Arbitrage – Doc. 7 [in French only] Questionnaire
S.d.N. – U.D.P 1934 – Etude III – Arbitrage – Doc. 6 [in French only]Rapport sur l’arbitrage conventionnel en droit privé. Annex C. L’exécution des sentences arbitrales en Angleterre
S.d.N. – U.D.P 1934 – Etude III – Arbitrage – Doc. 5 bis [in French only]
Comité pour l’arbitrage. Session de Brioni, 13-18 août 1934
S.d.N. – U.D.P 1933 – Etude III – Arbitrage – Doc. 5 [in French only] Observations sur l’arbitrage par M. Simon Rundstein
S.d.N. – U.D.P 1933 – Etude III – Arbitrage – Doc. 4 [in French only]Rapport sur l’arbitrage conventionnel en droit privé. Annex B. La clause compromissoire et la jurisprudence franco-belge
S.d.N. – U.D.P 1933 – Etude III – Arbitrage – Doc. 3 [in French only]
Rapport sur l’arbitrage conventionnel en droit privé. Annex A. La clause d’amiable composition
S.d.N. – U.D.P 1932 – Etude III – Arbitrage – Doc. 2 [in French only]Rapport sur l’arbitrage conventionnel en droit privé. Etude de droit comparé par René David
S.d.N. – U.D.P 1929 – Etude III – Arbitrage – Doc. 1 [in French only]Rapport sur la question internationale de la procédure d’arbitrage en matière privée présenté au Conseil de Direction session décembre 1929
U.D.P. 1951 – Etude XXV – Arbitrage entre Gouvernements et Particuliers – Doc. 8 [in French only]
Comité d’études pour l’arbitrage entre gouvernements et particuliers. Procès-verbal de la quatrième session (Rome, les 3, 4 et 10 mars 1950)
U.D.P. 1950 – Etude XXV – Arbitrage entre Gouvernements et Particuliers – Doc. 7 [in French only]
Avant-projet d’une Convention internationale sur l’arbitrage entre gouvernements et particuliers
U.D.P. 1949 – Etude XXV – Arbitrage entre Gouvernements et Particuliers – Doc. 6 [in French only]
Comité d’études pour l’arbitrage entre gouvernements et particuliers. Procès-verbal de la troisième session (Rome, les 8 et 9 juin 1949)
U.D.P. 1949 – Etude XXV – Arbitrage entre Gouvernements et Particuliers – Doc. 5 [in French only]
Comité d’études pour l’arbitrage entre gouvernements et particuliers. Procès-verbal de la deuxième session (Rome, les 10 et 11 mars 1949)
U.P.L. 1949 – Papers XXV – Arbitration between Governments and Individuals – Doc. 4
Arbitration between Governments and Individuals. Remarks concerning the draft Arbitration Convention between States and Individuals by Justice Algot Bagge
U.P.L. 1949 – Papers XXV – Arbitrage entre Gouvernements et particuliers / Arbitration between Governments and Individuals – Doc. 3
Arbitrage entre Gouvernements et particuliers. Avant-projet d’une Convention internationale permettant de recourir à la Cour permanente d’arbitrage de La Haye, pour le règlement des différends nés des contrats commerciaux conclus entre États et particuliers / Arbitration between Governments and Individuals. Preliminary draft of an international Convention providing for recourse to the Permanent Court of Arbitration at The Hague, for the settlement of differences arising out of commercial contracts between States and Individuals
U.D.P. 1948 – Etude XXV – Arbitrage entre gouvernements et particuliers – Doc. 2 [in French only]
Première session du Comité de travail pour l’étude de l’arbitrage entre gouvernements et particuliers. Procès-verbal (Rome, le 11 mai 1948)
U.P.L. 1948 – Papers XXV – Arbitration between Governments and Individuals – Doc. 1(1)
Arbitration between Governments and Individuals. Draft report (Revised edition)
U.P.L. 1948 – Papers XXV – Arbitration between Governments and Individuals – Doc. 1
Arbitration between Governments and Individuals. Draft report
Professor Iacopo Donati is the UNIDROIT/Bank of Italy Chair Holder and is mainly responsible for assisting in the Bank Insolvency project. He is Professor of Corporate and Insolvency Law at the University of Siena, and coordinates the research project ‘Pro.Re.Ba.’ (Proportionating rules on bank crisis prevention and management to the case of retail banks), which has received funding from the Italian Ministry of University. He has previously taught corporate law at the University of Venice ‘Ca’ Foscari’, at the University of Florence and at the University of Rome ‘Tor Vergata’.
Professor Donati is the author of several publications on corporate law, restructuring, insolvency law, and bank crisis management. On the same topics, he has been invited as a speaker to various international and national conferences and participated in some high-impact international, European, and national research projects. Professor Donati’s education includes a Ph.D. in Corporate Law (University of Rome ‘La Sapienza’), an LLM in Corporate Governance (Stanford Law School), and a Law Degree with honors (University of Florence). He is qualified as an attorney in Italy and in the State of New York (USA).
Ms Olga Fonotova is an Associate Professor of the Faculty of Law (Department of Legal Regulation of Business) at the Russian National Research University “Higher School of Economics” in Moscow. She holds a PhD degree cum laude in private law / private international law from the Lomonosov Moscow State University (2006). Her academic and teaching interests cover private international law, international and national commercial law, with a focus on unified and non-state legal regulation of cross-border commerce.
Olga is a Russian law qualified practicing lawyer in the sphere of national and international commercial and corporate law with 20+ years’ experience in leading law firms. As part of her legal practice, she has advised multinational corporations on the setting up of multi-jurisdictional commercial relations, on the formation / termination of international joint ventures, restructuring of assets, and financing / refinancing of projects. For her work on commercial and corporate legal matters she was included in the international rating of leading lawyers “The Best Lawyers® in Russia” (2018 – 2022).
She is a UNIDROIT alumna (2011) and a Correspondent of UNIDROIT in Russia (2023 – 2025). From 2016 to 2021 Olga was a member of the ICC Commission on Commercial Law and Practice (ICC CLP) and a member of the Association of European Business (AEB) in Moscow.
Allan M. Mukuki, PhD Candidate (Navarra, Spain), LLM (Groningen, Netherlands), PGDip (KSL), LLB (Hons) (UoN), ACIArb (London), Advocate of the High Court of Kenya.
Allan Mukuki is an Advocate of the High Court of Kenya as well as a Commissioner for Oaths. He is presently a PhD Candidate at the University of Navarra in Spain. He is also a holder of an LL.M in International Law and the Law of International Organizations, from the University of Groningen in the Netherlands. He has an LL. B (Hons) from the University of Nairobi, he is a Member of the Cha
rtered Institute of Arbitrators (London). He further holds a post-graduate diploma in law from the Kenya School of Law. Allan is also a scholar from the Hague Academy of International Law.
Some of his many roles in the legal profession include Director of International Partnerships; a Doctoral Fellow; member of the Management Committee and moot court coordinator, all for Strathmore Law School; Research Fellow for the African Region (Kenya), for the European Research Council Grant Project on the interpretation of customary international law; and Acting Director for the Strathmore Institute of Advanced Studies in International Criminal Justice (SIASIC)
Allan has previously worked at A.F Gross Advocate; in various legal institutes; in governmental agencies and in the Judiciary of Kenya. He was also a Legal researcher in the Office of the Solicitor General, Kenya, for the Maritime Delimitation in the Indian Ocean (Somalia v. Kenya), a case that was before the International Court of Justice. His main areas of specialization include Public International Law, The Law of International Organizations, International Humanitarian Law, International and Regional (EAC) Refugee Law and Legal Policy Development.
Further, Allan has been involved in various national and international legal consultancies and projects; he has published several peer reviewed legal articles, a legal monograph and presented several legal papers in international conferences around the world. He has also developed several policy documents for Strathmore University as well as (currently operational) manuals and laws for the operation of the Judiciary as well as governmental agencies and regional agencies such as IGAD.
ANDREA SANTACOLOMA
Director
PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE
Andrea Santacoloma is a Panamanian lawyer that focuses her practice on international commercial arbitration.
Prior to joining Adell & Merizalde, Andrea was the Deputy Director for Latin America of the ICC International Court of Arbitration for 5 years. In this role, she gained vast experience in the internal functioning of the ICC’s Secretariat and Court and saw first-hand the work of hundreds of arbitrators and ICC Court Members in the region. Andrea was also in charge of identifying new opportunities and potential users of the ICC Dispute Resolution Services (ICC DRS) in Latin America, in liaison with the ICC National Committees and other institutions in the region. She also worked as a lawyer advising local and international clients on business and corporate law and M&A in 3 Panamanian law firms.
She is currently the Executive Director of the Latin American Arbitration Association (ALARB), one of Latin America’s leading associations gathering practitioners and arbitrators, which seeks to encourage the use of arbitration and foster initiatives for the development of international arbitration in the region.
In July 2022, the G
overning Council of the International Institute for the Unification of Private Law (UNIDROIT) appointed Andrea as a Correspondent for Latin America. Namely, Andrea was appointed as a Correspondent for the Republic of Panama for the period 2022-2025.
EDUCATION
• American University Washington College of Law, LL.M. in International Arbitration and Business Law
• International Training Centre of the International Labor Organization (ILO) jointly with the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), Università degli Studi di Torino, and University Institute of European Studies (IUSE), LL.M. in International Trade Law & Dispute Resolution
• Universidad Católica Santa María La Antigua, LL.M. in Corporate Law
• Universidad Católica Santa María La Antigua, Degree in Law and Political Science
• Centro de Estudios Regionales de Panamá, Diploma in Entrepreneurship and Management of Small and Medium Enterprises
Bar admissions
Republic of Panama
Languages
Spanish, English, Italian (intermediate)
asantacoloma@adellmerizalde.com
+507 370 4155
NAME: PROF. DR. HERNANY VEYTIA (LL.M. YALE)
AFFILIATION DIRECTOR BNM-CAMBRIDGE STUDY CENTRE ON SUSTAINABLE INVESTMENTS
PRESENTATION
Professor of law, international strategic consultant, arbitrator, and entrepreneur. Hernany Veytia is very comfortable with complex, high-profile and confidential transactions. Her consulting experience as partner of BNM and Deloitte enables her to focus on and add value to the sustainable and commercial aspects of each deal. Frequently she leads transdisciplinary teams to deliver fact findings and legal opinions, feasibility studies and turn-key projects for banks, governments, international organisations, and corporations willing to expand or withdraw operations in other jurisdictions.
In Prof Veytia’s experience UNIDROIT works have been very useful to understand not only the foreign law, but also to recognise the cultural, political, and economic factors at play, and the way national and international regulators operate-and cooperate. In her opinion, UNIDROIT instruments have been of utmost importance for the legal strategies she designed for:
• DANPREIT (Dispute Analytics Platform for Real Estate Investment Trusts in the Agriculture, Construction and Mining industries).
• TELEKAIROS, innovative methodology that incorporates the use of space assets.
• Corporate art collections, restitutions, including donations, sponsorships, and loans to museums.
• Contracts used by a German waterworks company willing to grow in all the Caribbean and Central American countries.
• Liquidation of commercial and investment banks
• IPOs and reverse mergers for companies in the extraction industries (Canadian stock exchange), ILS listed in Bermuda and African sovereign funds listed in London.
• Franchising and other commercial contracts in the food & drinks, health, aero-space, and automotive industries.
In the last three decades Prof. Veytia has lived, and successfully completed investments and disinvestments in more than forty countries in the five Continents. She is frequently appointed as arbitrator and invited as speaker on risk transfers at international industry conferences in fields of her expertise: energy (both renewable and traditional), artificial intelligence, infrastructure, mining, real estate, agriculture, rail, space, automotive, and franchising. She sits in the board of directors of companies in Europe including the United Kingdom.
Anna Veneziano is the Deputy Secretary General of the International Institute for the Unification of Private Law (UNIDROIT). She is a Professor of Comparative Law at the University of Teramo, Italy, where she was formerly the Director of the Department of Private Law. She has also formerly been a tenured Professor of European Property Law at the University of Amsterdam (UvA). Her education includes a Law Degree with honours from the University of Rome La Sapienza, an LL.M degree from the Yale Law School funded by a Fulbright scholarship, and a PhD degree from the University of Florence (Italy).
Her main research and publication areas are on secured transactions as well as international, comparative, and European contract and sales law. Before joining UNIDROIT she was a member of the Italian delegation with respect to the Cape Town Convention on International Interests on Mobile Equipment and its Aircraft Protocol as well as its Space Protocol. She was also a member of the Study Group on a European Civil Code and of the Compilation and Redaction Group on a Draft Common Frame of Reference on European Private Law (DCFR), and of the restricted Expert Group set up by the European Commission on a common European law on sales.
P
rofessor Ignacio Tirado was appointed Secretary-General by the Governing Council at its 97th session, and officially took office on 27 August 2018. A national of Spain, Professor Tirado (Commercial, Corporate and Insolvency Law, Universidad Autónoma of Madrid, Spain) holds a PhD from the Universities of Bologna and Autónoma de Madrid and an LLM from the University of London. Professor Tirado has been a Senior Legal Consultant at the World Bank’s Legal Vice-Presidency and Financial Sector Practice for more than nine years, having also consulted for the IMF on insolvency related matters as well as for the Asian Development Bank on commercial legal reform.
Amongst other accolades to his professional experience, Professor Tirado is a founding member of the European Banking Institute, an International Fellow of the American College of Bankruptcy and has been Director and Academic Co-Chair of the International Insolvency Institute.
A Swedish national, Ms Lena Peters grew up in Italy where she attended an English school. In 1978 she took her Juris Kandidatexamen at Stockholm University followed by a Master of Laws from King’s College, London (1979). Since 1985 she has been with UNIDROIT, first as Research Officer, lastly as Principal Legal Officer, her main duties being Secretary to the Working Group for the Preparation of Principles of International Commercial Contracts, Secretary to the Study Group on Franchising, Secretary to the Committee of Governmental Experts on Franchising.She also collaborated on the project for the preparation of the ELI-Unidroit Model European Rules of Civil Procedure. She is currently Managing Editor of the Uniform Law Review and responsible for publications at UNIDROIT.
Marina Schneider is Principal Legal Officer and Treaty Depositary at UNIDROIT. She studied law at the University of Strasbourg (France) and Paris I – Panthéon Sorbonne. She joined the UNIDROIT in 1987 and was involved in the elaboration and French versions of most UNIDROIT instruments since. She is in charge of the 1995 UNIDROIT Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects and of the UNESCO-UNIDROIT Model Provisions on State Ownership of Undiscovered Cultural Objects. She is the author of the Explanatory Report of the 1995 Convention and many articles on the Convention and other international instruments in the field. Ms Schneider is also responsible for the project on private collections and for the UNIDROIT Convention Academic Project (UCAP). She is member of the Board of the International Society for Research on Art and Cultural Heritage Law (ISCHAL).
Professor of Commercial Law, Carlos III University of Madrid. Currently, Sir Roy Goode Scholar at UNIDROIT, Rome, 2021-2022. Chair of Excellence 2017-2018 at University of Oxford (Uc3m- Santander Program), affiliated to Harris Manchester College. Previously Distinguished Visiting Professor and fellow of a number of Academic Institutions. Arbitrator of Madrid Court of Arbitration. Member of ELI (European Law Institute) Council and Executive Committee. Member of the Expert Group of the European Commission on Liability and New Technologies and member of the Expert Group of the European Observatory of Platform Economy; the International Academy of Commercial and Consumer Law; the expert group of the Inclusive Global Legal Innovation Platform for Online Dispute Resolution – UNCITRAL and Hong Kong Department of Justice. Expert of the UNIDROIT Study Group on the MAC Protocol of the Cape Town Convention on International Interests. Delegate of Spain to UNIDROIT for the adoption of the Protocol, delegate of Spain in Working Group VI of UNCITRAL on secured transactions and in Working Group IV on Electronic Commerce. Member of UNIDROIT Working Groups on Enforcement and Warehouse Receipts.
William Brydie-Watson is an Australian lawyer who specialises in secured transactions law and private international law. Before joining UNIDROIT, William was a government lawyer in the Private International Law and International Arbitration section of the Australian Attorney-General’s Department, where he worked primarily on treaty negotiation and the implementation of private international law treaties in Australia. At UNIDROIT, he is primarily responsible for the implementation of the Mining, Agriculture and Construction (MAC Protocol) to the 2001 Cape Town Convention on International Interests in Mobile Equipment and the development of a Model Law on Factoring. William also serves as UNIDROIT’s liaison with the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) forum and as manager of the Institute’s Scholarship and Internship Programme. Admitted to practice in New South Wales and the High Court of Australia, he has a Bachelor of Arts (honours), a Bachelor of Laws and a Master of Laws from the Australian National University. William also lectures on International Secured Transactions Law at the Eotvos Lorand Faculty of Law in Budapest.
